Trump was not alone, major ,edia outlets are full of concerns from those opposing Trump that the Democratic Socialists of America are connected to communists and have crazy ideas\u2013and how imperative it is for the Democratic Party to stop these insurgents or face electoral defeat. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Democratic Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed is progressive, not a self-described socialist, but he, in many ways, represents a test, as he advocates Medicare for All. Though as a Muslim and harsh critic of Israel\u2019s systematic human rights violations\u2013he\u2019s been the subject of vile Islamophobia, including President Trump calling him a jihadist<\/a>, and some prominent Michigan Jews being skittish about his candidacy, so he\u2019s certainly not solely being evaluated on Medicare for All.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Not surprisingly in this context Americans generally have a negative view of socialism, namely among independents, Republicans and older voters. Younger voters and Democrats are more positive (see graphs below).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ask folks to define socialism or communism and many opponents get tongue-tied. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Jordan Kepler of the Daily Show asked Trump supporters to define communism <\/a>and\u00a0 got results (at least in what was included) from \u201cI really can\u2019t give you a definition\u201d to essentially some idea of losing freedom to \u201cthis is the best country in the world and we don\u2019t want to change it\u201d followed by stone silence when pushed to define communism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Vice President J.D. Vance gave it a completely different twist when asked to define socialism, \u201coh, man, I guess, it\u2019s a hard term to define these days. I don\u2019t know what the term means anymore. I think in reality what it actually means in the American context is that you want to replace American workers with foreign workers, and you want boys to play in girls\u2019 sports.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n Karl Marx (1818-1883) couldn\u2019t have said it better (I\u2019m joking if you don\u2019t notice sarcasm).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Marx\u2019s desire to overthrow the bourgeoisie (capitalist ruling class) and co-authorship in 1848 of The Communist Manifesto inspired subsequent revolutionaries like Vladimir Lenin (1870-1924). This often leads us to focus on Marx\u2019s weakness, instead of his strengths. Marx\u2019s real expertise was not communism\u2013a utopian vision of society\u2013but his analysis of capitalism. The deftness of Marx\u2019s criticism of those enriched through the exploitation of the masses in the industrial revolution stands in sharp contrast with his relative naivete about the process of societal change needed to build an alternative society. George Orwell (1903-1950), a staunch democratic socialist, wrote about the dangers of Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist authoritarianism, nicely summarized in his 1945 allegory Animal Farm<\/em>. <\/p>\n\n\n While Marx focused largely on class, today we also know that race\/ethnicity, gender, nationality, religion and other identities can become fulcrums of societal divisions. But notably class is often overlooked. We are living in a second gilded age, where the wealth divide is immense. Elon Musk\u2019s net worth is close to a trillion dollars. A trillion is a million times a million. So for someone who has assets worth a million dollars, as about 1 in 6 households do<\/a>, Musk has a million dollars for each and every one of those dollars. At the same time, this is a country that does not ensure people access to housing, health care or even food. So many people in this country are homeless, struggle to pay rent, forgo medical help due to cost, can\u2019t fill their gas tanks\u00a0 or are food insecure.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Similar stark differences led Marx to analyze the inner workings of capitalism from his vantage point in London during the industrial revolution. He emphasized that the interests of workers and capitalists are in conflict. Capitalists want to make profits and push workers by paying them less or making them work longer or harder. So in fact the idea of bringing in foreign workers to undermine domestic labor is more consistent with historic capitalism, Vice President Vance, not socialism. Through commodity fetishism people get enamored by the goods but lose track of the labor and the exploitation of that labor which may be behind them. Then they buy the cheapest goods, reinforcing the most exploitative practices. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Capitalism\u2019s contradictory impulses create busts when pushed to its extreme, with very high profits and low wages, workers cannot spend enough and the system crashes. Today we\u2019re seeing record amounts of money invested into Artificial Intelligence software and accompanying hardware (data centers), but profits are lagging and if there\u2019s insufficient profit, it will also collapse. Consequently, capitalism inevitably has boom and bust cycles. But typically when it goes bust, the people hurt the most aren\u2019t capitalists but workers. Recall the bailouts for Wall Street but not Main Street after the 2008 economic collapse.We have socialism for the rich with government bail outs of too big to fail, but do not do likewise for everyone else. Inflating prices today hurts everyone, except those benefiting from inflated stock prices\u2013a much smaller, privileged segment of society.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Much of the 20th century reforms to a fairly unregulated \u201cfree\u201d market did not exist in Marx\u2019s time. They have worked to make a boom-bust system, more stable and functional. But we still have intolerable extremes. <\/p>\n\n\n\n These growing intolerable extremes have made candidates successful who are more willing to speak out about the need for fundamental change. That change need not mean the extreme results that were the outgrowth of Marx\u2019s analysis, the proletariat seizing the means of production. History has shown its limitations, both in terms of achieving that end as well as the means to do so. The proletariat may never be ready, which is what led Lenin to envision an intermediary vanguard\u2013which ultimately became its own permanent ruling class, the Communist Party. Seizing the means of production has not led to the intended utopian results either with Cuba being a good illustration (an analysis complicated by its reliance on fuel subsidies from the Soviet Union and later Venezuela combined with ongoing sanctions and interference from the United States). In the United States a sizable amount of Marx\u2019s proletariat form the MAGA political base of the billionaire, graft-centered Donald Trump. But we should not accept that these realities are immutable. We need to find ways to rebalance the scales between capital and labor to enable the benefits of capitalism to be shared more evenly. That\u2019s my understanding of the goals of Democratic Socialism whether one agrees with specific policies advocated for or not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Though the United States has maintained higher economic growth than other advanced economies, it has consistently failed to find a better balance of shared benefits. So higher growth has not meant the best comparative quality of life, ranking 17th in the Human Development Index.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n So in an age where billionaires try and buy elections, a bit more Marxian analysis is patriotic, and so is a bit more socialism unless, that is, you want Social Security benefits to be cut to eliminate its upcoming funding crisis or you want to return to a time when you could be excluded from healthcare coverage due to a pre-existing condition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.makedemocracywork.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/image.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.makedemocracywork.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/image-1.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.makedemocracywork.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/image.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.makedemocracywork.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/image-1.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n