Published in East Valley Opinions of the Arizona Republic on February 15, 2006 as “Give English Learners a Chance.”
¿Tendría problema en aprender sobre terremotos en un salon de clases dónde nadie habla ingles?
We often take speaking English for granted. If you’ve traveled internationally, you likely experienced situations where as an English-speaker you felt lost. In Arizona’s schools 154,000 children face the challenging transition of learning English, while simultaneously needing to meet state standards if they are to graduate.
Even if you resent that the parents of some of these children aren’t here legally, one of this country’s most basic precepts is that children deserve equal opportunity. We don’t punish children for the acts of their parents. Most of these kids are U.S. citizens by birth, and nearly all of the rest came here when they were so young that they can’t recall any other country, but this one.
It’s a precept embodied in the Federal Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974, a law that in 2000 U.S. District Court Judge Alfredo Marquis ruled Arizona failed to uphold, eight years after the Flores family filed suit on behalf of their children.
Sadly, a child who entered Kindergarten in 1992 would have graduated in the class of 2005 and never seen the state live up to the law. Many of those Kindergarteners who were English Language Learners never graduated. Offered an inadequate opportunity, many ended up unable to read well, were unsuccessful in school, and dropped out. High school dropouts make up more than half of our prison population. How many of those Kindergarteners now sit in jail?
I’m deeply saddened that none of our Southeast Valley Republican legislators have stood up for these children, not Rep. Laura Knaperek, not Sen. Jay Tibshraeny, and certainly not those leading the political assault like Rep. Russell Pearce. Senator Karen Johnson on automated phone calls going throughout the Valley blames the governor for playing politics with kids. Sen. Johnson better look in the mirror.
If these legislators visited Thews Elementary in Tempe or Holmes Elementary in Mesa’s district 18 represented by Pearce and Johnson, sat in the classrooms, listened to teachers and children, they’d change.
The state commissioned a study from the National Conference of State Legislatures to find out what it would cost to do right by these kids. In the cross section of school districts examined, they determined funding for ELL would have to increase from $670 extra per student ($360 currently come from state funds) to $1,200 extra for somewhat proficient students and $2,300 for students with the least proficiency in English.
The state department of education recently released to school districts a memo entitled, “The Arizona Structured English Immersion Program.” In classrooms where English Language Learners are integrated, not segregated, from other students, it recommends for high-need students that classes have no more than 15 students per properly trained teacher and possibly a language assistant, if needed. For students with some English proficiency, class sizes could rise to 20.
When you consider that current class sizes are 20-22 in the early grades and often 25 or higher later, reducing class sizes would require substantial new funding. Moving from a class size of 22 to 15 costs an additional $1,000 in just staffing costs for every student, not just English Language Learners.
State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne needs to talk with his fellow Republicans in the legislature, because their proposals don’t come remotely close to funding any of these ELL models. I believe we all share the dream that today’s Kindergarten students will be successful and graduate, not end up in jail. Legislators need to stop the bickering and give these kids a future.
Dave Wells of Tempe holds a doctorate in Political Economy and Public Policy and teaches at Arizona State University. Reach him at Dave@MakeDemocracyWork.org.
Sources and comments:
Spanish means, “Would you have trouble learning about earthquakes in a classroom where no one spoke English?”
154,000 English Learners: Judge gives Napolitano victory with ruling on English-learners
Chip Scutari
The Arizona Republic
Jan. 27, 2006 12:00 AM
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0127english-learners29.html
U.S. law broken—from interview with Tim Hogan of Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest.
Most of the children are U.S. citizens. The Pew Hispanic Research Center estimates that 500,000 people in Arizona are here illegally. Nationwide, they find that 17% of them are under 18. Based on that we can surmised that about 85,000 children are here illegally, of which about 70% or 60,000 might be school-age. Not all school-age children here illegally are English Language Learners. So 94,000 children plus the portion of children here illegal who are NOT ELL does compose most children who are ELL. I presume only a small fraction of these children perhaps up to 10,000 might be here legally on some kind of visa, but that would still leave 84,000+ as U.S. citizens.
Prison and drop outs: If you examine the Department of Corrections population summary based on reported education by inmates, just under half have less than the equivalent of a high school degree, and one-third report having a GED, which meant they likely dropped out of high school as well. (These figures may overstate education levels, since they are reported by inmates and not verified). http://www.azcorrections.gov/reports/Who.htm#POPULATION_SUMMARY
The only Republicans who opposed the SB1198 and HB2002 (the two bills Gov. Napolitano vetoed) were Sen. Carolyn Allen and Sen. Toni Hellon.
Senator Johnson’s automated phone calls: “Phone campaign blasts Napolitano: Activist group backs drive ripping tax credit vetoes,” By DENNIS WELCH, East Valley TRIBUNE, February 7, 2006, p. A1.
School perspectives: “What cost English?” by Jennifer Pinner, East Valley Tribune, February 5, 2006, p. A1, A6.
Arizona English Language Learner Cost Study 2005 http://www.azleg.state.az.us/alispdfs/council/Ell_Cost_Study.pdf (The approx. $310 per student that is not from state funds primarily comes from local property taxes that are dedicated to desegregation due to prior court orders and Federal Title III monies, the latter amounting to about $100 per student—based on interview with Tim Hogan and http://www.coursecrafters.com/ELL-Outlook/2005/mar_apr/ELLOutlookITIArticle4.htm, “Where’s the Beef?: Tracking the Federal Funds Behind ELL Mandates,” By Michelle Adam, ELL Outlook™ Staff Writer.)