Published Friday, February 18, 2005 as “Higher costs test school” and Wednesday, February 23, 2005 as “Kyrene victim of tightfisted legislature.” in different editions of East Valley Opinions of the Arizona Republic.

As we entered the Kyrene Middle School cafeteria for a public forum last week, we were serenaded by an orchestra and handed a leaflet, a musical protest to the conflict between a stingy legislature and an out of control accountability system.

Much angst is rippling through Arizona due to the impending AIMS graduation requirement to be hoisted upon the class of 2006. Next week students take the writing and reading portions of AIMS, in April the feared math test. Meanwhile, in K-8, by 2014 No Child Left Behind (NCLB) expects every student to make adequate yearly progress. For most students that means passing AIMS. But are schools given the resources to meet these standards?

Like the past few years, aside from enrollment growth, to meet their basic maintenance and operation expenses school districts will again receive just the 2 percent increase per annum mandated by voter approved Proposition 301 in 2000. Unfortunately, Kyrene, like most districts, faces a 5 percent increase in costs.

Due to a sluggish stock market and low interest rates, the state is mandating school districts raise pension contributions by 2.55 percent. As personnel represents 90 percent of school district expenses, that increases costs 2.3 percent

Teachers face a matching increased deduction from their pay, so in Kyrene teachers are counting on their roughly 2 percent annual experience-based salary adjustment to compensate for it.

Finally, health insurance keeps going up. In Kyrene insurance costs are expected to rise 12 percent next year, increasing their budget obligations by an additional 1 percent. Kyrene is in a fortunate position where their insurance trust fund will likely absorb this cost, but just for next year.

Kyrene’s executive director of student services Christie Winkelman says they are doing everything possible to keep resources going to the classroom. Nineteen administrative and support positions have been left vacant in the last two years, and they are scrambling to figure out how to do without coordinators of transportation and supplemental services. A couple years ago the middle school athletic program was eliminated, too.

Ironically, Kyrene’s families are some of the wealthiest in the state, only 14 percent of students come from homes that qualify for the reduced or free lunch program, for which the highest qualifying income is $35,000 for a family of four. However, for the last 25 years, how wealthy you are hasn’t mattered as Arizona equalizes base school funding. The state legislature augments property taxes on a sliding scale to ensure all districts receive the same amount. That’s good, but unfortunately it turned school finance from the province of local districts to our tightfisted state legislature. In Arizona we take it as gospel that we have always ranked last in funding. Not true. In 1980 we ranked 28th; by 1990 we had slid to 39th, and today we’re next to last. Not satisfied, in the name of limiting expenditures through HCR2029 and SCR1020 East Valley Representatives Mark Anderson, Laura Knaperek, Warde Nichols, Russell Pearce, Gary Pierce, and Steve Yarbrough along with Senators Marilyn Jarrett, Karen Johnson, and Thayer Verschoor hope to cast this funding deficit into stone.

Kyrene is one of our best performing districts, but they aren’t making progress against the NCLB 2014 time clock. In writing and reading 85 percent of third graders passed AIMS, but by eighth grade it’s down to 72 percent. In math, it falls from 81 percent to 44 percent. So Kyrene is wrestling with the value of orchestra when you are mandated to improve math scores but not master Mozart. Parents came out last week to emphasize just how important electives like orchestra are to a quality education. They even threatened to pull their kids if need be. Administrators take those threats seriously. The district has a slowly declining student population with about 3,500 children lost to non-district schools though it pulls in another 1,600 through open enrollment. District representatives say each net loss costs the district another $4,000 in funding, but you can’t just fire a teacher because a school has four less kids in fifth grade this year than last, not if you’re concerned about improving test scores.

We do need creative solutions for improving education, but it’s an insult to our teaching professionals to say it’s not also about resources. Just do the math.

Dave Wells of Tempe holds a doctorate in Political Economy and Public Policy and teaches at Arizona State University. Reach him at Dave@MakeDemocracyWork.org.

 

Sources:

Presentation by Kyrene School District Officials on Thursday, February 10, 2005

  • By 2014 No Child Left Behind (NCLB) expects every student to make adequate yearly progress. For most students that means passing AIMS.
  • Increase in health care costs. Funding coverage through trust fund indicated by Terry (sorry didn’t get last name–but he’s a finance person) at the administrative office.
  • Test Scores in Writing, Reading and Math for 2003-2004.
  • 2.55 percent increase in pension contribution noted at presentation and by Terry as well as Doug Kilgore who does Government Relations for the Arizona Education Associaton. Same three sources for the 2 percent per annum increase for Prop. 301.
  • 90 percent of budget on personnel based on budget handouts provided at the presentation.
  • Christine Winkelman at presentation and follow up on phone confirmed the administrative staff vacancies along with the enrollment losses to non-district schools, mostly charter schools as well as the open enrollment additions.
  • Middle School athletic program cut mentioned twice during presentation–saved $350,000.
  • Terry, the business officer, went through the details by which the $4,000 per student funding is arrived at. In short the Base Student Level funding is just under $3,000. The formula then is multiplied by 1.158 to up this to 3474. (there are additional add-ons for Special Ed, K-3, and English Leaners which we’re omitting). Due to Kyrene’s higher teacher exp level they get an additioanl 1.0195 multiplier bringing their total to $3541. There are then per student funding for soft capital and >> at $225 each per head or $450, yielding $4,000. (this leaves out a transportation adjustment).
  • Teacher salary steps at http://www.kyrene.org/hr/performance_pay/payscale/2004-05%20Certified%20Salary%20Schedule%20(208%20days).pdf

Historical Rankings and information on transition to an equalization formula: The Condition of School Funding in Arizona: 2004 by Richard L. Wiggall Northern Arizona University, see Table 1 on page 2.

Reviewed by Charles Essigs

Arizona Association of School Business Officials

and William Wright Northern Arizona University

Released by Education Policy Lab, Arizona State University www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/AEPI/EPSL-0405-114-AEPI.pdf

 

School lunch income eligibility is from the federal government with a cut off of 186% of the poverty line or $34, 873 for a family of four. (table can be downloaded) http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/governance/notices/iegs/iegs.htm

 

HCR2029 and SCR1020 East Valley Representatives Anderson, Knaperek, Nichols, Pearce, Pierce, and Yarbrough along with Senators Anderson, Jarrett, Johnson, and Verschoor hope to cast this deficit funding into stone. These twin constitutional amendments are modeled after Colorado’s TABOR (Taxpayer Bill of Rights) which limits increases in government expenditures to population growth plus inflation. This is tantamount to what has occurred the last few years in Arizona with education funding being limited to enrollment growth plus the two percent mandated amount of Prop. 301. All the Representatives and Senators listed are primary or co-sponsors of the legislation.